2021/02/10-3 Richard W. Painter

https://twitter.com/RWPUSA/status/1359172127354667013

午前1:07 · 2021年2月10日

"And realizing that the women had an incentive to shirk, the brothel owners demanded a contractual structure that gave women incentives to work hard."

By having forced sex with soldiers?

This disgusting paper justifying war crimes must be retracted.

"売春宿の主人たちは、女性たちに怠ける動機があることに気づき、女性たちが懸命に働く動機となるような契約形態を要求した。"

兵士と強制的にセックスすることで？

戦争犯罪を正当化するこの胸糞悪い論文は撤回されなければならない。


https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0144818820301848


コメント

コメントを投稿

このブログの人気の投稿

2021/02/10-2 Richard W. Painter

https://twitter.com/RWPUSA/status/1359207291044651009 午前3:27 · 2021年2月10日 Only in "law and economics" is a woman who refuses to have sex with enough soldiers in a single day described as "shirking." What is wrong with people? 一日に十分な数の兵士とのセックスを拒否した女性を "シャーキング "と表現するのは、「法と経済」の世界だけです。 人としてどうかしている。
続きを読む

2021/02/07-7 Richard W. Painter

イメージ
https://twitter.com/RWPUSA/status/1358309883263729666 午後4:01 · 2021年2月7日 OK.  I think we get it.... https://japan-forward.com/interview-harvard-professor-mark-ramseyer-asks-whats-gotten-into-the-korean-judiciary/ INTERVIEW | Harvard Professor Mark Ramseyer Asks, ‘What’s Gotten Into the Korean Judiciary?’ Published 2 years ago on January 31, 2019, By Jason Morgan, Reitaku University Harvard Law Professor Mark Ramseyer The Reality of the Mobilization of Koreans During World War II – An Analysis Based on Statistics and Written Records Mobilization of Koreans During WWII – Analysis Based on Statistics Mark Ramseyer, Mitsubishi Professor of Japanese Legal Studies at Harvard Law School, is one of the world’s foremost authorities on Japanese law. He is also a keen observer of East Asian affairs. JAPAN Forward’s Jason Morgan recently sat down with Professor Ramseyer to sound him out on regional developments in the realm of law and policy in Northeast Asia. Below are excerpts from the inter...
続きを読む

2021/02/10-6 Richard W. Painter

https://twitter.com/RWPUSA/status/1359507447241728003 午後11:20 · 2021年2月10日 What is the point of peer review in academic journals if an economic justification of rape, child rape and war crimes passes "peer review" at the International Journal of Law and Economics? レイプ、児童レイプ、戦争犯罪を経済的に正当化するものが、International Journal of Law and Economicsで「査読」を通過するのであれば、学術雑誌における査読の意味はあるのでしょうか？
続きを読む